Resistance profile of DELSTRIGO® (doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate)
Learn about:
DRIVE-SHIFT: In a 48-week study of virologically suppressed adults, which evaluated DELSTRIGO (n=656):
Zero cases of doravirine resistance in two subjects in the Immediate Switch Group (ISG)1
aProtocol-defined virologic failure is defined as two consecutive measurements of HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL at least one week apart.1
bTwo of the 6 virologic failure subjects in the ISG had available resistance data and neither developed detectable genotypic or phenotypic resistance to doraviririne, lamivudine, or tenofovir during treatment with DELSTRIGO.
cOne of the 2 virologic failure subjects in the DSG who had available resistance data developed the RT M184M/I substitution and phenotypic resistance to emtricitabine and lamivudine during treatment with their baseline regimen.
dThis subject developed the RT M184M/I substitution and phenotypic resistance to FTC and 3TC during treatment with their baseline regimen.
DRIVE-SHIFT: 144-week extension phase evaluating DELSTRIGO vs baseline regimen. After the 144-week extension phase (week 48 to week 144), there were
Zero cases of resistance to doravirine in the four participants with samples available2,3
eDefined as two consecutive measurements of HIV-1 RNA >=50 copies/mL at least one week apart.
fParticipants who were tested for resistance in the extension to week 144: 4 participants had resistance data after 144 weeks in the extension phase. None of these 4 participants had resistance to DOR, 3TC, or TDF. Two participants were in the ISG—they did not have PDVF but discontinued early.3
gParticipants who were tested for resistance in the extension to week 144: 4 participants had resistance data after 144 weeks in the extension phase. None of these 4 participants had resistance to DOR, 3TC, or TDF. Two participants were in the DSG and had PDVF.3
Limitation: No formal statistics testing was planned for this updated analysis and, therefore, no statistical conclusions can be drawn.
Study designs
DRIVE-SHIFT study design
A randomized, multicenter, active-controlled, non-inferior, open-label phase 3 trial of adult participants with virologically suppressed HIV-1 for ≥6 months on 2 NRTIs with a PI plus either ritonavir or cobicistat, elvitegravir plus cobicistat, or an NNRTI, with no history of virologic failure. Participants were either immediately switched to DELSTRIGO on day 1 of the 48-week trial (Immediate Switch Group (ISG) [n=447]) or continued their baseline regimen and switched after 24 weeks (Delayed Switch Group (DSG) [n=223]) to DELSTRIGO.1,2
Extension Study: Participants who completed the 48-week visit were eligible to continue receiving open-label DELSTRIGO for an additional 96 weeks, up to week 144.1,2
Primary efficacy end point: Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL in the ISG at week 48 vs the DSG at week 24: 2% for DELSTRIGO vs 1% for the baseline regimen. Difference (95% CI): 0.7 (-1.3, 2.6).1
Additional efficacy end point: Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL in the ISG at week 48 vs the DSG at week 24: 91% for DELSTRIGO vs 95% for a baseline regimen.1
Safety end point: For participants whose baseline regimen included a PI plus ritonavir: Mean change from baseline to week 24 in fasting LDL-C and non-HDL-C.1
DRIVE-AHEAD study design
A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferior, phase 3 trial comparing DELSTRIGO once daily (n=364) vs 600 mg EFV/200 mg FTC/300 mg TDF once daily (n=364) in treatment-naïve adult participants with HIV-1 RNA ≥1000 copies/mL.4,5
Primary efficacy end point: Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at week 48 for DELSTRIGO vs EFV/FTC/TDF: 84% vs 81%. Difference (95% CI): 3.5 (-2.0, 9.0).4
Secondary efficacy end point: Percentage of participants with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL at week 96 for DELSTRIGO vs EFV/FTC/TDF: 77% vs 74%. Difference (95% CI): 3.8 (-2.4, 10.0).5
Primary safety end point: Percentage of participants with three pre-specified neuropsychiatric events (dizziness, sleep disorders/disturbances, and altered sensorium) at week 48.4,a,b
- Dizziness: 9% for DELSTRIGO vs 37% for EFV/FTC/TDF. Difference (95% CI): -28.3 (-34.0, -22.5); P<0.001
- Sleep disorders and disturbancesc: 12% for DELSTRIGO vs 26% for EFV/FTC/TDF. Difference (95% CI): -13.5 (-19.1, -7.9); P<0.001
- Altered sensoriumd: 4% for DELSTRIGO vs 8% for EFV/FTC/TDF. Difference (95% CI): -3.8 (-7.6, -0.3); P=0.033
Safety end point: Mean change from baseline to week 48 in fasting LDL-C and non-HDL-C.4
an=364 for each treatment group.
bThe 95% CIs were calculated using Miettinen and Nurminen’s method.
cPredefined using MedDRA preferred terms, including: abnormal dreams, hyposomnia, initial insomnia, insomnia, nightmare, sleep disorder, and somnambulism.
dPredefined using MedDRA preferred terms, including: altered state of consciousness, lethargy, somnolence, and syncope.
Acronyms
3TC, lamivudine; DOR, doravirine; EFV, efavirenz; FTC, emtricitabine; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol; MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities; NNRTI, non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; NRTI, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; PI, protease inhibitor; RNA, ribonucleic acid; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
References
- Johnson M, Kumar P, Molina JM, et al; for the DRIVE-SHIFT Study Group. Switching to doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF) maintains HIV-1 virologic suppression through 48 weeks: results of the DRIVE-SHIFT trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;81(4):463-472. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000002056.
- Kumar P, Johnson M, Molina JM, et al; for the DRIVE-SHIFT Study Group. Switching to DOR/3TC/TDF maintains HIV-1 virologic suppression through week 144 in the DRIVE-SHIFT trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021;87(2):801-805. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002642.
- Data available on request from Merck Professional Services-DAP, WP1, PO Box 4, West Point, PA 19486-0004. Please specify information package US-DOV-01329.
- Orkin C, Squires KE, Molina JM, et al; for the DRIVE-AHEAD Study Group. Doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is non-inferior to efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in treatment-naive adults with human immunodeficiency virus-1 infection: week 48 results of the DRIVE-AHEAD trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(4):535-544. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy540.
- Orkin C, Squires KE, Molina JM, et al. Doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/TDF in treatment-naive adults with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection: week 96 results of the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 DRIVE-AHEAD noninferiority trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(1):33-42. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa822.